There is no perfect energy source. Each and every one has its own advantages and compromises. This series will explore the pros and cons of various energy sources. Nuclear power is widely accepted as a somewhat dangerous, potentially problematic, but manageable source of generating electricity. Radiation isn’t easily dealt with, especially in nuclear waste and maintenance materials, and expensive solutions are needed to contain, control, and shield both people and the environment from its harm.
PROS
|
CONS
|
Lower carbon dioxide (and other greenhouse gases)
released into the atmosphere in power generation.
|
High construction costs due to complex radiation
containment systems and procedures.
|
Low operating costs (relatively).
|
High-known risks in an accident.
|
Known, developed technology “ready” for market.
|
Long construction time.
|
Large power-generating capacity able to meet industrial
and city needs.
|
Target for terrorism (as are all centralized power
generation sources).
|
Existing and future nuclear waste can be reduced
through waste recycling and reprocessing.
|
Waste lasts 200 – 500 thousand years.
|
Meltdowns. If there is a loss of coolant water in a
fission reactor, the rods would overheat.
|
From the above mentioned pros and
cons of nuclear power plants, it should be evident that nuclear energy cannot
be a solution to any problem. Even worse: it is the source
of many further problems.
We
must not any longer shut our eyes to the consequences of our being on earth.
Besides moral, ethical and spiritual reasons, at least for the pure will to
survive we should consequently strive for a sustainable living and realize it
in our personal life. It's time for change!
Positive site, where did u come up with the information on this posting?
ReplyDeletecheck this out